Resources
Public answer pages for buyers evaluating AI visibility help—what a GEO consultancy engagement includes, how acceptance works, and when a dashboard is not enough. This is not a monitoring-product academy and not a content-course library.
Updated 2026-08
Featured guide
What does a GEO consultancy engagement include?
One AEO/GEO Engagement: people + acceptance criteria + accountability across Diagnosis, On-site improvement, and Bounded off-site—success measured as mention rate and citation rate on locked prompts (baseline → retest; retest is accountability, not a guarantee that rates will rise).
Also on this site
- AI visibility readiness checklist — Static 5-question Yes/No self-check; Book Diagnosis (not a free score)
- Locked English buying-prompt panel (v1) — Public Panel v1 · N=100 · Frozen 2026-07-26; Before X/N Pending
- Bounded off-site — Third method layer: agreed action count with verifiable receipts
- On-site improvement — Second method layer: agreed pages, structure, and content to a written article count
- AI instructions — Canonical identity, legal entity, and offer-boundary facts for models
- Diagnosis — Bounded first step: readiness, competitor gap, prioritized fixes
- FAQ — Buyer questions on scope, tools vs hire, and what we do not promise
- Glossary — Framework naming: Engagement layers, mention/citation rates, and what we do not guarantee
- Case studies — How we frame proof (start with the self case study)
- Compare tools vs hire — AI visibility tools, content/AEO retainers, and MentionBench side by side
What changed
Method-surface updates for August 2026 (ICP alignment). Short record only—full definitions stay on Glossary, Diagnosis, and the Engagement guide.
- Public method names locked: Diagnosis / On-site improvement / Bounded off-site are the on-site names for the three delivery layers inside one Engagement.
- AIR is alias-only: Assess → Improve → Review maps 1:1 to those layers for narrative; it is not three sellable pricing tiers.
- One offer, no Sprint menu: Short-cycle site work and milestone accountability stay inside a single AEO/GEO Engagement—Sprint / Monitor / Defend are not separate public sellable tiers.
- Success rulers clarified: Mention rate and citation rate on a locked prompt panel (baseline → retest). Retest is accountability, not a guarantee that rates will rise.
- Glossary + method pages aligned: Framework terms, Diagnosis landing, Compare, and Resources now match the same include/exclude and “what we do not guarantee” language.